Catty Wells Fargo Retaliation Against Critics Has A Long History
Catty Wells Fargo Retaliation Against Critics Has A Long Cold & Calculated History That Goes Back Nearly A Decade
Wells Fargo retaliation against their critics has been going on for a nearly a decade. The attempted retaliation is catty in its nature and shows how immature, egomaniacal, and/or narcissistic their executives are. Take your pick. Wells Fargo executives are also almost as entertaining as watching the catfights between Joan Collins and Linda Evans on the old TV show, Dynasty. It’s also ineffective and makes Wells Fargo look extremely bad because it usually blows up in their face.Financial Web Sites Were The First To Feel Wells Fargo Retaliation
ML-Implode Feels The Wrath Of Wells Fargo Retaliation
Wells Fargo retaliation against websites began in 2012.
Alternative financial website ML-Implode posted stories by blogger Martin Andelman about Wells Fargo jerking around former Wells Fargo customer Norman Rousseau. The bank put Rousseau through so much hell that they drove him to commit suicide.
The bank didn’t have cojones to go after major media outlets like the HuffPost or UK Guardian.
So, instead, they went after the smaller websites like ML-Implode.
ML-Implode made a shocking discovery in the summer of 2012. They discovered Wells Fargo had frozen the main business account for ML-Implode with no warning.
Wells Fargo flagged the account as a “credit risk.” The bank slated it for immediate closure.
This was slightly unusual because ML-Implode’s account was a plain checking account. In fact, ML-Implode paid a monthly fee for the account. So Wells Fargo was only shooting themselves in the foot.
Wells Fargo also made a $3500 deposit from ML-Implode’s merchant account processor disappear when they seized the account.
Comments
Post a Comment